May 7, 2015
As president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, it is my personal responsibility and civic duty to speak for the common good, which I believe is served by preserving natural marriage protection through state laws.
The question is whether the long-standing definition of marriage should be overturned. It is a far reaching question, but not merely because marriage is connected to more than a thousand laws or regulations, everything from the tax code to health benefits to higher education. It is a far-reaching question because if the Supreme Court does not uphold the right of states to protect a natural definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman, it will unleash a lengthy litany of litigation that could unravel the very fabric of society.
What’s being lost in the debate is why marriage wound up in civil law at all. Civil law has long recognized the unique way the twin goods of marriage contribute to the common good of society. To thrive, society must recognize the foundational and indispensable union of man and woman as the irreplaceable basis of family life. To survive, society must protect this union as the way civilization replenishes itself through the gift of new human life.
Recognizing the essential meaning of marriage means recognizing the matchless contribution it makes to society. There remains only one stable way to bring a child into the world. The divine origin of life is uniquely found in the union between a man and a woman, and this is why marriage is afforded special status in law. In honoring marriage as exclusively between a man and a woman, as has every civilization and generation from antiquity, civil law merely reflects a society’s desire to continue to exist. To confirm the undeniable truth of this is not in any way to discriminate against anyone. It is merely to point to the past, the present, and the future.