Jul 21, 2011
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say something that might not win me many friends: “What the Church says” about many things isn’t clear. That’s right, the Church’s teaching on many topics is unclear.
I should immediately follow this up with the statement, though, that whether or not something is good or bad, right or wrong, does not always depend on the Church’s teaching about it. Indeed, to trade on then-Cardinal Ratzinger’s famous line that “Truth is not determined by a majority vote,” we must concede that what is good, right, and true is not necessarily determined by an ecclesial teaching.
Admittedly, some things are good because they’re taught by the Church — like the order of Mass, or the precept of making a sacramental confession at least once per year. In short, items of practice attain their value by virtue of being positively prescribed by one (i.e., the Church) who is herself good, right, and holy.
Moral things are a bit trickier, however, since they have a basis in nature. What I mean, here, is that things like abortion, contraception, IVF — and even lying and gluttony — attain their moral status as derivative of our human nature. The same is true for morally good acts, like telling the truth, obeying the law, and respecting one’s parents.