Oct 24, 2011
This article will examine the Catholics on the south-eastern end of the Church’s traditional reach, those of the Czech lands, Slovakia and Hungary. The three Churches here had vastly different experiences during the war years. For the Czechs, the war had come early, in the wake of the Munich agreement of 1938. No other country suffered such a prolonged occupation, and few had such a surreal experience. Shorn of most of its majority German-speaking land in the Sudeten, the Czechs would have been justified in fearing the worst. After all, they were Slavs and Nazi ideology had little time for Slavic peoples. However, somehow the Czechs were seen as different, and they never suffered to the same extent as the Poles or the Russians.
The Slovaks, another Slavic people, entered into a full-blown alliance with the Nazis. For centuries, their country had been part of Hungary. Since 1918, they had been incorporated into Czechoslovakia, which fell apart in 1939. Always somewhat resentful of their more prosperous compatriots, a tide of Slovak national awareness had been building up against the Czechs. This was enhanced by the threat of Hungary, which sought to reclaim vast swathes of southern Slovakia with a Hungarian majority population. These were, indeed, lost, with Hungary enjoying Nazi support for this annexation. The rump Slovakia became officially independent in March 1939, with a German puppet regime installed in Bratislava.
The third country examined here, Hungary, had an even stranger recent past. Between 1861 and 1918, she had been one half of the Habsburg double monarchy, partnering Austria. The so-called Lands of the Crown of St. Stephen had included much of Slovenia, Croatia, Transylvania and Slovakia, as well as Ruthenia. These were all lost in the wake of the defeat in the First World War, at the Treaty of Trianon. This was to the Hungarians what Versailles was to the Germans, and Hungarian public life was dominated by an irredentist drive: the lost lands had to be re-conquered.
In all three countries, the Catholic Church had held a strong institutional position during the long centuries of Habsburg rule, but its popularity varied enormously. In Slovakia the Church was regarded as a bulwark of Slovak identity, and priests were prominent in its nationalist movement. For centuries, the Church had given the mountain-dwelling Slovaks an outlet to celebrate their national culture. In Hungary, the Church was part of the mainstream in the west of the country. Here, however, memories of the Reformation lingered, and large swathes of the country were dominated by Calvinist churches. Amongst those who had favored the old monarchy, the Church was most popular. The old Emperor, Franz Joseph, had been a fervent protector of the Church and it, in turn, had provided his dynasty with unswerving support. This had not endeared it to the Czechs, who had struggled with the monarchy for years.
The upper echelons of the Church had been filled by Austro-Hungarian noblemen, and this did not change immediately after 1918. In some places, as for example in the Czech seat of Litoměřice, German-speaking incumbents were left in place, even if the majority of the population spoke Czech. In Slovakia, the Bishopric of Rožňava was filled by Hungarian-born Lajos Balós de Sipek. For the Czechs, finally, there was the long memory of the Hussite Wars of the Middle Ages, which nineteenth-century historians had transformed from a theological conflict into a national war against the Church. There were, then, rather a large number of factors at play that determined both the reaction and the experience of the Churches in the three countries.