Jun 24, 2011
Returning to the United States with my family for a summer break from Haiti’s improving, but still challenging, post-earthquake conditions, I naively hoped that being back in the United States would provide some welcome relief from the chaos of the past many months. Not so much.
At least, not with the ridiculous Wiener Scandal dominating CNN and the myopic madness of the NBA blasting out of every bar TV in the Miami airport—my usually immediately comfortable second home. In retrospect, Haiti was a refuge of sanity.
Turning to the Wall Street Journal in search of a bit of bland respite, I was treated to a front page story about a tax deduction victory for caretakers of stray animals. Evidently, the IRS, on behalf of the taxpayer, recently lost a case against a lady who took over $12,000 in deductions in 2004 for taking care of stray cats. Unsurprisingly, she represented herself because she could not afford a lawyer in the protracted multi-year case.
In the interest of full disclosure, I head a non-profit. I obviously support philanthropic donations being tax deductible. But, having just left a country where millions of humans lack adequate food and shelter, I would have preferred to hear the judge say something like, “While technically your support qualifies for a tax deduction, I think the public good would have been better served by putting the cats to sleep.” Instead, amazingly, he wrote a 42 page decision that generally agreed with a woman who keeps 70 cats in her house.