Jun 30, 2010
I read a lot of marriage and relationship books. The subject of compatibility comes up often. One I read recently concluded that a marriage can legitimately be over if compatibility problems are discovered along the way. This idea of compatibility being the basis of a good and happy marriage is widely accepted.
As a Catholic, I am not a fan of marriages ending at all. However, marriages do end, and practically speaking I recognize that some marriages end for good reason. If this were not true, there would be no such thing as declarations of nullity from the Catholic Church. Compatibility is something I would recommend that couples have as they determine their decision to get married. But the word does not mean what it has come to now mean; namely, a congruence of interests. This makes compatibility mean that the individuals of the couple have similarities that make it very easy to be together. Even the thesaurus on this Microsoft Word software says that “compatible” means “well-suited”.
Couples with a congruence of interests make marriage look easy. Where there is a congruence of interests, there seems to be no issue of age gap. I am thinking about the great Catholic philosopher, Dietrich Von Hildebrand who married a woman 34 years younger than him, Alice Von Hildebrand. Their deep interest in the Catholic faith and philosophy brought them together and gave them a congruence that made it so age did not matter. Their marriage endured, and Alice has been a widow for many, many years. But she, of course, would never trade the years she had with this man she loved with all her heart.
Does this mean you cannot have a happy and loving marriage if you don’t have similar interests? If you have more differences than similarities?