Mar 26, 2010
I recently read Joel Stein’s tongue-in-cheek column [Time March 29, 2010] about his joy at finding out that his son, Laszlo, is genetically more influenced by him than his wife. Evidently, for a relatively small amount of money and a bit of saliva, one can secure (or lose) parental boasting rights. The days of relying on the unscientific, subjective statement by a friend or family member that your son or daughter favors you are gone. For $499, you can be sure, down to the genome.
Of course, Mr. Stein has, at least momentarily, overlooked the impact of nurture on human development. In the end, a person is not solely the product of his or her original nature. Our creation continues long after our birth. People, environment, education and choices play a large role in who we will finally become. Looking back from mid-life, I would say our neonatal nature is only a stepping off point, not a AAA Triptik.
Therefore, parental influence continues long after the initial genetic donation, which means Mr. Stein’s competition with his wife is far from over. I would say that this will be especially true for little Laszlo, given the Steins’ decision to have his drool tested as an infant. One can only imagine the coaching he is in for on his college application. Laszlo may want to retain a privacy lawyer and look up B. F. Skinner’s grandkids for advice on how to deal with overly involved parents.
Even less neurotic parents have a lot of influence on their child’s development. Until we take the driver’s seat as captains of our destiny, which occurs at about two in the modern child, our parents make a lot of life forming decisions for us. These early choices mold our supple brains and start us on certain paths. Certainly, these choices have more influence on who we become than our chromosomal map.