May 6, 2014
Pope John Paul II’s legacy is momentous. To most of us growing up in the late twentieth century, Pope John Paul II was the quintessential pope. Omnipresent and highly charismatic, this pope was a venerable force in the world as the representative of our truly universal Church. Most Catholics were inspired and touched by the dynamism of his papacy and the force of his words. We found that he was speaking not only for our Church, but to us personally.
When John Paul’s Letter to Women was published in June of 1995, Catholic women around the world were moved by its words of deep appreciation for and profound recognition of particular feminine qualities, the “feminine genius” as he had already called it in his apostolic letter On the Dignity and Vocation of Women in 1988. Receptivity, sensitivity, generosity, and maternity were vital aspects of this “feminine genius.” In his Evangelium Vitae, he even espoused a “New Feminism” as a prerequisite for defending life. He consistently emphasized the importance of women’s integration in all areas of public, social, and economic life. John Paul’s words of praise and tender appreciation of women’s capacity to love and nurture spoke to us directly as women and many felt affirmed in their special role not only as mothers, but as vital contributors to all areas of society.
Both the word “feminism” and his sticking with Church teaching on artificial birth control and the priestly ordination with women meant it all got wrapped up in ideological divisions. Which means, we missed a treasure. And so today, Catholic women in the Western world can still not agree on their particular role. They still seem split on the issue of motherhood and public career. Tensions between those women, who opt to stay at home and those who pursue careers seem to have increased over the years. I have personally experienced stares of boredom from women when I revealed my own choice of home-making while I felt resentment and, no doubt, envy towards those with exciting careers. Once I began to engage in projects outside of the home, I could, equally, sense misgivings among women who did not. Such tensions among women are unfortunate and run counter not only to John Paul’s affirmation of womanhood, but stand in opposition to the Gospels. As resourceful as we are, we can do better than harbor resentment and engage in competition over who is “more Catholic.”
Like all great saints, John Paul presents us with a challenge. He makes us think seriously about our fulfillment in faith through our God given nature. As we contemplate our vocation, his words encourage us to begin with fundamentals, not specific politics. As Catholic women, we should thus resist being pulled down to the level of feminist power politics and, instead, consider John Paul’s definition of the “feminine genius” as a challenge in our own personal journey of faith. Such a shift in focus will inevitably lead to a greater understanding of our common goals as women and help us realize our full potential. As we consider the complexity of life, we come to understand that women’s lives can differ in radical ways due to external circumstance. Yet instead of embarking on debates on the proper and practical realization of faith, we would do better to first focus on our commonality, on what we can bring to the world in the most essential way in line with Christ’s teachings. It is in this context, that John Paul’s words have the greatest power.