Jul 19, 2010
Critics have hailed “The Last Airbender” as a disaster and as an end of the career of director M. Night. Shyamalan. And while the movie does boast of terrible acting and very poor scripting especially when it comes to dialogue, it also features a tranquility and an originality that puts this film in the realm of something worth seeing.
Based on an animated TV series, “The Last Airbender” takes viewers to a mythical place, not unlike earth, where some people are born with the ability to manipulate or “bend” the elements. The inhabitants of this world, which on a map does not look unlike east Asia, are divided into four tribes, based on the four elements: air, water, earth, and fire. The plot of the film centers around the fact that the central figure to the world’s spirituality, a figure who can manipulate all four elements and communicate with the spirit world in order to maintaining peace between the four tribes, the Avatar.
As the movie explains through a series of rather incoherent flashbacks and disjointed narration, the Avatar disappeared 100 years ago. In his absence, the war-like Fire Nation has attempted to subjugate the other tribes. Knowing that the next avatar would come from the Air Nomads, they slaughtered the tribe before oppressing the Earth Nation and banning the practice of “bending” in across the tribes.
Into this strife, a brother and sister are born in the Southern Water tribe. Though their stories are perhaps unique and intriguing, the acting and dialogue is not. Whatever the viewer learns about these characters comes by accident, not by virtue of the script or casting. Thus, scene after scene of awkward acting and lines crafted so poorly as to make one want to cry, the siblings discover a unique and intriguing child trapped in a globe under the ice sheets that surround their home.